Machu Picchu wins tourism prize for best environmental fate of South America

[ad#ad-160]
[ad#ad-160]

Machu Picchu wins tourism prize for best environmental fate of South America

Machu Picchu was featured as the best eco-destination in South America by the World Travel Award 2010, an institution with 17 years of experience that recognizes and celebrates excellence in all sectors of the tourism industry and travel the world, informed the Commission Promotion of Peru Export and Tourism (PromPeru).

The award, which has its own categories, covering all continents, is considered by the prestigious journal estadouidense The Wall Street Journal as the “Oscars” of the tourist world.

This distinction was established on October 22 in Jamaica. Machu Picchu was imposed on other applicants destinations such as the Pantanal in Brazil and Argentina’s Patagonia.

This is the second award for Peru by the World Travel Award in 2009 for PromPerú won for best tourism promotion office.

“This award shows that the tourism sector has an impact on the economic, social and environmental aspects of country, “said Rocio Merino, Director of Tourism Promperú.

More than 185,000 worldwide tour operators were responsible for applying for Machu Picchu, which in Quechua means “old mountain and make it a winner. It was learned that the ecological fate vote was one of the highest and considered voting record.

Travel Machu Picchu

The official handover will take place in London on 7 November. This will show off the award stand in Peru of World Travel Market 2010, also held in that city the same week.

The citadel of Machu Picchu is located on a mountain of granite structure. Using clever techniques, the Incas managed to transport heavy stone blocks and carve and polish them with surprising neatness.

About Mariana Balanescu South America

Manager of South America Information. Places to visit. Tours to South America. News. South America Countries Information and more. Feel free to conctact me
This entry was posted in News. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply